I identified the questions arising from opinions on positive views by hosting the Olympics and listed the questions needed to obtain more accurate data.

The view of increasing tourism: accurate tourism categories and standards are needed for the fact that tourism is increasing and the record of tourists has increased. What was the tourism industry like before the start of the Olympics, and what kind of tourism industry increased with the start of the Olympics? Has the tourism industry revived only in certain areas? Overall, has tourist attractions been in the spotlight?

The view of raising international trade and status: an accurate comparative analysis of the opinion that trade flow can be permanently increased is needed. What is the evidence that it can be increased permanently? Has the Olympic host country a long time ago also permanently increased its trade flow to this day? Does the meaning of becoming one of the developed countries change as international trade increases?

The view of creating national pride: By hosting the Olympics, it created national pride of the people and said that its performance at the Olympics is important for national pride. If there is no result in the Olympics, can the people's national pride fall? In what ways is the most positive if spending growth can be positive for the economy by hosting the Olympics? Is it a temporary increase in spending?